David Albert Jones in the New York Times: The End of Roe Doesn’t Need to Increase Maternal Mortality
The New York Times has published a piece by our Director, David Albert Jones, challenging the common argument that restrictions on abortion are harmful to maternal health by pointing to the evidence from Europe which shows that it is “not necessary or inevitable that the overturning of Roe v Wade will lead to adverse health outcomes for women”.
At the same time he points out that the American states that are considering restricting abortion are those with a higher rate of maternal mortality. “If Mississippi and other red states wish to demonstrate that they are truly ‘pro-life’, then they must address their shameful levels of maternal mortality”. Be sure to have a read!
Most recent
Forthcoming 2025 Anscombe Memorial Lecture
Blackfriars, Oxford
We are pleased to announce that on 10 February 2025 at 4pm, the Anscombe Memorial Lecture will be he...
Press Statement – Regrettably Limited Debate & Appreciation of the Full Evidence at the ‘Assisted Dying’ Bill’s Second Reading
02 December 2024
The Anscombe Centre has expressed its regret at the limited debate or appreciation of the full evide...
Press Release – Public Opinion on Assisted Suicide: Unclear, Unchanged and Undecided
26 November 2024
The advocates of assisted suicide often argue that a clear majority of the public are in favour of l...
Support Us
The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.