David Albert Jones in the New York Times: The End of Roe Doesn’t Need to Increase Maternal Mortality

The New York Times has published a piece by our Director, David Albert Jones, challenging the common argument that restrictions on abortion are harmful to maternal health by pointing to the evidence from Europe which shows that it is “not necessary or inevitable that the overturning of Roe v Wade will lead to adverse health outcomes for women”.

At the same time he points out that the American states that are considering restricting abortion are those with a higher rate of maternal mortality. “If Mississippi and other red states wish to demonstrate that they are truly ‘pro-life’, then they must address their shameful levels of maternal mortality”. Be sure to have a read!

Most recent

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Release – Anscombe Centre Publishes Analysis of a Sinister Document About a Sinister Bill

23 May 2025

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre has published an analysis of the Government’s Impact Assessment of the...

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Statement – Hospices to be Forced to Provide Assisted Suicide

19 May 2025

The Anscombe Centre’s statement on the rejection of an amendment to Kim Leadbeater MP’s ‘assisted dy...

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Release – A New Anscombe Centre Paper Critiques the Assisted Dying Bill & its Implications for Vulnerable Patients

16 May 2025

As the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill receives its Report Stage debate today, the Anscombe...

Support Us

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.

FIND OUT MORE MAKE A DONATION