David Albert Jones in the New York Times: The End of Roe Doesn’t Need to Increase Maternal Mortality
The New York Times has published a piece by our Director, David Albert Jones, challenging the common argument that restrictions on abortion are harmful to maternal health by pointing to the evidence from Europe which shows that it is “not necessary or inevitable that the overturning of Roe v Wade will lead to adverse health outcomes for women”.
At the same time he points out that the American states that are considering restricting abortion are those with a higher rate of maternal mortality. “If Mississippi and other red states wish to demonstrate that they are truly ‘pro-life’, then they must address their shameful levels of maternal mortality”. Be sure to have a read!
Most recent
Press Release – Anscombe Centre Publishes Analysis of a Sinister Document About a Sinister Bill
23 May 2025
The Anscombe Bioethics Centre has published an analysis of the Government’s Impact Assessment of the...
Press Statement – Hospices to be Forced to Provide Assisted Suicide
19 May 2025
The Anscombe Centre’s statement on the rejection of an amendment to Kim Leadbeater MP’s ‘assisted dy...
Press Release – A New Anscombe Centre Paper Critiques the Assisted Dying Bill & its Implications for Vulnerable Patients
16 May 2025
As the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill receives its Report Stage debate today, the Anscombe...
Support Us
The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.