David Albert Jones in the New York Times: The End of Roe Doesn’t Need to Increase Maternal Mortality

The New York Times has published a piece by our Director, David Albert Jones, challenging the common argument that restrictions on abortion are harmful to maternal health by pointing to the evidence from Europe which shows that it is “not necessary or inevitable that the overturning of Roe v Wade will lead to adverse health outcomes for women”.

At the same time he points out that the American states that are considering restricting abortion are those with a higher rate of maternal mortality. “If Mississippi and other red states wish to demonstrate that they are truly ‘pro-life’, then they must address their shameful levels of maternal mortality”. Be sure to have a read!

Most recent

Gender Dysphoria

Press Release – Shining a Light on Gender Identity Services: What did the Cass Review Find?

22 May 2024

Dr Julie Maxwell has written a short paper on behalf of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre on the Cass Re...


Press Statement – Abortion Law at a Crossroads

14 May 2024

Our Press Statement concerning the abortion-related amendments to the Criminal Justice Bill which ar...

Assisted Reproduction

Press Release – Babies for Sale, Wombs for Rent: Why Surrogacy Must Not Be Normalised

13 May 2024

Surrogacy is always an injustice, according to Dr Pia Matthews, as she explains in a new essay writt...

Support Us

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.