David Albert Jones in the New York Times: The End of Roe Doesn’t Need to Increase Maternal Mortality
The New York Times has published a piece by our Director, David Albert Jones, challenging the common argument that restrictions on abortion are harmful to maternal health by pointing to the evidence from Europe which shows that it is “not necessary or inevitable that the overturning of Roe v Wade will lead to adverse health outcomes for women”.
At the same time he points out that the American states that are considering restricting abortion are those with a higher rate of maternal mortality. “If Mississippi and other red states wish to demonstrate that they are truly ‘pro-life’, then they must address their shameful levels of maternal mortality”. Be sure to have a read!
Most recent
Press Release – A New Anscombe Centre Paper Critiques the Assisted Dying Bill & its Implications for Vulnerable Patients
16 May 2025
As the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill receives its Report Stage debate today, the Anscombe...
Press Statement – Scotland Must Turn Off the Treacherous Path of Assisted Suicide
14 May 2025
The Anscombe Bioethics Centre expresses great concern over the vote by members of the Scottish Parli...
‘Beyond Consent – Rethinking Assisted Suicide Through A Family’s Eyes’ (Alicia Duncan)
07 May 2025
In this special interview – shared by kind permission of Our Duty Of Care (ODOC) – former palliative...
Support Us
The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.