David Albert Jones in the New York Times: The End of Roe Doesn’t Need to Increase Maternal Mortality

The New York Times has published a piece by our Director, David Albert Jones, challenging the common argument that restrictions on abortion are harmful to maternal health by pointing to the evidence from Europe which shows that it is “not necessary or inevitable that the overturning of Roe v Wade will lead to adverse health outcomes for women”.

At the same time he points out that the American states that are considering restricting abortion are those with a higher rate of maternal mortality. “If Mississippi and other red states wish to demonstrate that they are truly ‘pro-life’, then they must address their shameful levels of maternal mortality”. Be sure to have a read!

Most recent

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Release – Anscombe Bioethics Centre Reaction to the House of Commons Select Committee Report on Assisted Dying / Assisted Suicide

29 February 2024

From the perspective of ethics and of patient safety the most significant aspect of the House of Com...

Human Dignity

Press Statement – Who Decides If Unborn Lives Matter?

27 February 2024

Recent news stories reveal a contradictory attitude to how we treat unborn lives in our society. Is ...

Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide (EAS)

Press Release – Legalising ‘Assisted Dying’ in Australia Failed to Prevent “One Suicide a Week”

08 January 2024

New research published in the Journal of Ethics in Mental Health has found that the introduction of ...

Support Us

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is supported by the Catholic Church in England and Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, but has also always relied on donations from generous individuals, friends and benefactors.

FIND OUT MORE MAKE A DONATION